TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of three optical biometers
T2 - IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin
AU - Ortiz Zapata, Alvaro Ivan
AU - Galvis, Virgilio
AU - Tello, Alejandro
AU - Viaña, Victor
AU - Corrales, Maria Isabel
AU - Ochoa, Miguel
AU - Rodriguez, Carlos Julián
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2019/8/15
Y1 - 2019/8/15
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the results of optical biometry using the IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin in eyes with cataract. Methods: In 231 eyes of 152 patients with cataract, the measurements of 3 different biometers were retrospectively compared. Paired comparisons were performed for axial length (AL), mean keratometry (mean K) and anterior chamber depth (ACD). Results: In only 197 of the 231 eyes (85.3%), it was possible to obtain reliable measurements of AL with all the three devices. It was not possible to determine AL in 16 eyes (6.9%) with Lenstar LS 900; in 19 eyes (8.2%) with Aladdin; and in 20 eyes (8.6%) with IOLMaster 500 possibly related to the severity of lens opacification (the corneas had good transparency in the eyes included in the study). There was a statistically significant difference in AL between IOLMaster 500 and the remaining two biometers (P = 0.03). However, the amount of difference was considered clinically not significant (0.04 mm). The mean keratometry (mean K) was determined in 203 eyes (87.9%) with all the three devices. Differences in mean K were between − 0.1 and 0.06 Diopters (D), which were considered neither statistically (P > 0.05) nor clinically significant. The anterior chamber depth (ACD) was determined in 197 eyes (85.28%) with all the three biometers. The differences between the three devices (0.03 to 0.13 mm) were not statistically significant and considered also clinically not significant. Conclusions: There were no clinically significant differences between these 3 biometers in AL, mean K and ACD.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the results of optical biometry using the IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin in eyes with cataract. Methods: In 231 eyes of 152 patients with cataract, the measurements of 3 different biometers were retrospectively compared. Paired comparisons were performed for axial length (AL), mean keratometry (mean K) and anterior chamber depth (ACD). Results: In only 197 of the 231 eyes (85.3%), it was possible to obtain reliable measurements of AL with all the three devices. It was not possible to determine AL in 16 eyes (6.9%) with Lenstar LS 900; in 19 eyes (8.2%) with Aladdin; and in 20 eyes (8.6%) with IOLMaster 500 possibly related to the severity of lens opacification (the corneas had good transparency in the eyes included in the study). There was a statistically significant difference in AL between IOLMaster 500 and the remaining two biometers (P = 0.03). However, the amount of difference was considered clinically not significant (0.04 mm). The mean keratometry (mean K) was determined in 203 eyes (87.9%) with all the three devices. Differences in mean K were between − 0.1 and 0.06 Diopters (D), which were considered neither statistically (P > 0.05) nor clinically significant. The anterior chamber depth (ACD) was determined in 197 eyes (85.28%) with all the three biometers. The differences between the three devices (0.03 to 0.13 mm) were not statistically significant and considered also clinically not significant. Conclusions: There were no clinically significant differences between these 3 biometers in AL, mean K and ACD.
KW - Anterior chamber
KW - Axial length, eye
KW - Biometry
KW - Corneal topography/methods
KW - Diagnostic techniques, ophthalmological
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052289437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10792-018-1006-z
DO - 10.1007/s10792-018-1006-z
M3 - Artículo Científico
C2 - 30136018
AN - SCOPUS:85052289437
SN - 0165-5701
VL - 39
SP - 1809
EP - 1818
JO - International Ophthalmology
JF - International Ophthalmology
IS - 8
ER -