Twitter en tiempos electorales. Una revisión de #Colombiadecide

Translated title of the contribution: Twitter in electoral times. A review of #Colombiadecide

Ysabel Briceño Romero, Liliana Calderón-Benavides, Johana Andrea Manrique, Camila Gélvez Salazar

Research output: Articles / NotesScientific Articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the following article, we show some results of a revision of the hashtag #ColombiaDecide on the social network Twitter, which was promoted by a national media in the regional elections of October 2015 in Colombia. In the study, we try to analyze the trend of the influential users, according to the notion of authority or leadership that qualifies some social actors to inform, in which people trust to reproduce their messages, and the trend of inclusion of users in conversations derived from Twitter. The indicators in this review were messages with more re-tuits (RT) and users with more mentions (@). We applied them to a rating of users from which 4339 messages were replicated-RT, and 3527 messages were mentioned (@). We classified the users according to their accounts profile expressed in the ‘biography’ of each one. The results reported that although Twitter allows space for new actors, the media and journalists are still leaders in which users continue to trust to reproduce the content in the case of a hashtag that demands information about the election results. We also approached to show the relationship between the trend of inclusion of electoral candidates in the conversations derived from Twitter and the results of the voting, in the case of Bogota.

Translated title of the contributionTwitter in electoral times. A review of #Colombiadecide
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)216-236
Number of pages21
JournalAnuario Electronico de Estudios en Comunicacion Social Disertaciones
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Twitter in electoral times. A review of #Colombiadecide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this