TY - JOUR
T1 - Short-term efficacy to conventional blind injection versus ultrasound-guided injection of local corticosteroids in tenosynovitis in patients with inflammatory chronic arthritis
T2 - A randomized comparative study
AU - Pan-American League against Rheumatisms (PANLAR) Ultrasound Study Group
AU - Gutierrez, Marwin
AU - Di Matteo, Andrea
AU - Rosemffet, Marcos
AU - Cazenave, Tomas
AU - Rodriguez-Gil, Gustavo
AU - Diaz, Cristina Hernandez
AU - Rios, Lucio Ventura
AU - Zamora, Natalia
AU - Guzman, Maria del Carmen Gonzalez
AU - Carrillo, Ignacio
AU - Okano, Tadashi
AU - Salaffi, Fausto
AU - Pineda, Carlos
AU - Marta, Aliste
AU - Magaly, Alva
AU - Aragón-Laínez, R. A.
AU - Roser, Areny
AU - Marcelo, Audisio
AU - Ana, Bertoli
AU - Antonio, Bouffard José
AU - Vinicio, Caballero Uribe Carlo
AU - Walter, Camacho
AU - Francisco, Díaz Coto José
AU - Emilio, Filippucci
AU - Víctor, Flores
AU - Fritz, Hoffman
AU - Maria, Kourilovich
AU - Alexander, Mendonça José
AU - Carlos, Moya
AU - Claudia, Mora
AU - Roberto, Muñoz Louis
AU - Enrique, Py Guillermo
AU - Maritza, Quintero
AU - Pedro, Rodríguez Henríquez
AU - Jorge, Saavedra
AU - Lida, Santiago
AU - Oscar, Sedano
AU - Carla, Solano
AU - Lorena, Urioste
AU - Orlando, Villota
AU - Ceron, Carmen
AU - Saaibi, Diego
AU - Diaz, Mario
AU - Roth, Johannes
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Société française de rhumatologie.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Objective: To compare the short-term efficacy of conventional blind injection (CBI) versus ultrasound-guided injection (USGI) of corticosteroids (CS) injection in tenosynovitis in patients with chronic arthritis and to investigate if the USGI is a less painful procedure and if there are differences in the changes of US findings during the post injection follow-up. Methods: Patients presenting tenosynovitis requiring CS injection were involved. After clinical and US evaluation, patients were randomized to receive CBI or USGI. Efficacy of procedure was assessed by the improvement in both Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and pain visual analogue scale (VAS), including procedure-VAS global-VAS and local-VAS, after 1 and 4 weeks post-procedure. Power Doppler (PD) and greyscale (GS) US findings were also object of the follow-up. CBI or USGI under an aseptic technique were performed according the local guidelines using 20 mg of methylprednisolone acetate. Results: A total of 114 patients were randomized to receive CBI (54 patients) or USGI (60 patients) procedure. No significant difference was observed in terms of gender, age and pain duration among CBI and USGI groups at baseline. USGI proved to be significantly less painful than CBI (P = 0.0001). AUC analysis showed that during the follow up visits, the USGI procedure had significantly better response in HAQ, local-VAS and global-VAS (P = 0.0001, P = 0.012 and P = 0.0001 respectively) compared to CBI. During the follow up period, a significant greater reduction in the PD scores was found in the USGI group compared to the CBI group (P = 0.0002), whereas no statistical differences were found in the GS findings between the groups (P = 0.5627). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates superiority of USGI over CBI for CS injections in painful tenosynovitis, having better short-term outcomes measured by functional, clinical and US scores. These data support the use of USGI for tenosynovits in typical inpatient and/or outpatient in rheumatological practices.
AB - Objective: To compare the short-term efficacy of conventional blind injection (CBI) versus ultrasound-guided injection (USGI) of corticosteroids (CS) injection in tenosynovitis in patients with chronic arthritis and to investigate if the USGI is a less painful procedure and if there are differences in the changes of US findings during the post injection follow-up. Methods: Patients presenting tenosynovitis requiring CS injection were involved. After clinical and US evaluation, patients were randomized to receive CBI or USGI. Efficacy of procedure was assessed by the improvement in both Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and pain visual analogue scale (VAS), including procedure-VAS global-VAS and local-VAS, after 1 and 4 weeks post-procedure. Power Doppler (PD) and greyscale (GS) US findings were also object of the follow-up. CBI or USGI under an aseptic technique were performed according the local guidelines using 20 mg of methylprednisolone acetate. Results: A total of 114 patients were randomized to receive CBI (54 patients) or USGI (60 patients) procedure. No significant difference was observed in terms of gender, age and pain duration among CBI and USGI groups at baseline. USGI proved to be significantly less painful than CBI (P = 0.0001). AUC analysis showed that during the follow up visits, the USGI procedure had significantly better response in HAQ, local-VAS and global-VAS (P = 0.0001, P = 0.012 and P = 0.0001 respectively) compared to CBI. During the follow up period, a significant greater reduction in the PD scores was found in the USGI group compared to the CBI group (P = 0.0002), whereas no statistical differences were found in the GS findings between the groups (P = 0.5627). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates superiority of USGI over CBI for CS injections in painful tenosynovitis, having better short-term outcomes measured by functional, clinical and US scores. These data support the use of USGI for tenosynovits in typical inpatient and/or outpatient in rheumatological practices.
KW - Chronic arthritis
KW - Costicosteroids
KW - Local injections
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959482116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.04.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.04.017
M3 - Artículo Científico
C2 - 26645159
AN - SCOPUS:84959482116
SN - 1297-319X
VL - 83
SP - 161
EP - 166
JO - Joint Bone Spine
JF - Joint Bone Spine
IS - 2
ER -