TY - JOUR
T1 - Immobilization of lipases on glyoxyl-octyl supports
T2 - Improved stability and reactivation strategies
AU - Suescun, Angélica
AU - Rueda, Nazzoly
AU - Dos Santos, Jose C.S.
AU - Castillo, John J.
AU - Ortiz, Claudia
AU - Torres, Rodrigo
AU - Barbosa, Oveimar
AU - Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/6/29
Y1 - 2015/6/29
N2 - Lipases from Candida rugosa (CRL) and from Candida antarctica (isoform A) (CALA) have been successfully immobilized on octyl-glyoxyl agarose (OCGLX) beads and compared to the octyl-agarose (OC) or glyoxyl (GLX) beads immobilized counterparts. Immobilization on OCGLX gave similar hyperactivations than those found for the immobilization on OC supports, although the incubation at pH 10.0 for 4 h decreased the activity of both enzymes by 25%. After reduction, more than 95% of the enzyme activity was covalently attached to the support. The fraction not covalently attached was desorbed by washing with detergent. These biocatalysts were more stable than the octyl counterparts in thermal or organic solvent inactivation. More interestingly, the irreversible immobilization permitted the reactivation of CALA biocatalysts inactivated by incubation in organic solvent, after unfolding in the presence of guanidine and refolding in aqueous buffer (around 55% of the activity could be recovered during 3 successive cycles of inactivation/reactivation). GLX-CALA permitted to recover 75% of the activity, but the thermal stability and activity was much lower, and this strategy could not be applied to CRL. Neither the enzyme immobilized on cyanogen bromide nor the enzyme immobilized on OCGLX exhibited significant activity after the unfolding/refolding strategy.
AB - Lipases from Candida rugosa (CRL) and from Candida antarctica (isoform A) (CALA) have been successfully immobilized on octyl-glyoxyl agarose (OCGLX) beads and compared to the octyl-agarose (OC) or glyoxyl (GLX) beads immobilized counterparts. Immobilization on OCGLX gave similar hyperactivations than those found for the immobilization on OC supports, although the incubation at pH 10.0 for 4 h decreased the activity of both enzymes by 25%. After reduction, more than 95% of the enzyme activity was covalently attached to the support. The fraction not covalently attached was desorbed by washing with detergent. These biocatalysts were more stable than the octyl counterparts in thermal or organic solvent inactivation. More interestingly, the irreversible immobilization permitted the reactivation of CALA biocatalysts inactivated by incubation in organic solvent, after unfolding in the presence of guanidine and refolding in aqueous buffer (around 55% of the activity could be recovered during 3 successive cycles of inactivation/reactivation). GLX-CALA permitted to recover 75% of the activity, but the thermal stability and activity was much lower, and this strategy could not be applied to CRL. Neither the enzyme immobilized on cyanogen bromide nor the enzyme immobilized on OCGLX exhibited significant activity after the unfolding/refolding strategy.
KW - Covalent immobilization
KW - Enfolding/refolding
KW - Enzyme reactivation
KW - Enzyme stabilization
KW - Immobilization of lipases via interfacial activation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933279246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.procbio.2015.05.010
DO - 10.1016/j.procbio.2015.05.010
M3 - Artículo Científico
AN - SCOPUS:84933279246
SN - 1359-5113
VL - 50
SP - 1211
EP - 1217
JO - Process Biochemistry
JF - Process Biochemistry
IS - 8
ER -