Agreement between Two Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography: Optic Nerve Head, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell Layers in Healthy Eyes

Aim and background:Precision of optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements of the optic nerve head (ONH), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) is essential for the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of retinal and ONH parameters measured with two identical swept-source optical coherence devices. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 30 eyes of 15 healthy subjects were included. Two technicians performed four OCT-wide protocol scans in the same visit using two identical Triton swept-source OCT (DRI-OCT) instruments. The interdevice and interobserver reproducibility and the repeatability of both instruments for all ONH, RNFL, and macular GCL parameters were evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Additionally, Bland–Altman test analysis was used for repeatability and reproducibility measurements. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCs) of the ONH, RNFL, and GCL measurements were excellent for repeatability and interdevice reproducibility (>0.9). Interobserver reproducibility was good for all parameters except for RNFL clock hour 11 (ICC = 0.72). The variability of the average RNFL was from −4.103 to 4.97 µm, with a mean percentage of the difference (PD) of 0.37 ± 2.03%. Among GCL parameters, the greatest variability was found in the inferior sector (PD = −0.88 ± 5.39%, limits of agreement (LoA) = −8.345–7.078 μm). Conclusion: Using two identical swept-source OCT instruments for the evaluation of the structural parameters of the ONH, RNFL, and macular GCL showed high repeatability and reproducibility. This allows the clinician to make a therapeutic decision based on OCT findings coupled with the clinical evaluation of the patient. When evaluating RNFL clock hours measurements, interobserver reproducibility might decrease. Clinical significance: The understanding of measurement variability while using different devices and the impact of the observer capturing the images, is clinically relevant.